RESOURCES · EXPERTINI ATS

Microsoft Ads for Job Posts

A second paid-search channel with different economics than Google's — genuinely useful for some roles, not a free upgrade for all of them.

2 min read · Updated July 2026 · Expertini Editorial

Microsoft Advertising (Bing, plus its syndication to Yahoo and AOL search inventory) runs on a smaller search volume than Google but with a meaningfully different audience and cost profile. Expertini's Microsoft Ads Integration connects a published job to a Microsoft Advertising campaign through the same in-ATS workflow as the Google Ads Connector, so testing whether the second channel is worth it for a given role is a low-effort comparison rather than a separate project.

▶ Watch the 30-second overview — no sign-up needed

20–38%lower typical CPC than Google for recruitment keywords, per published benchmarks

65–70%of Microsoft/Bing search traffic skews desktop

30–50monthly conversions still needed for Smart Bidding to optimise reliably

1Microsoft Advertising account required — yours, billed directly by Microsoft

01Why the CPC economics differ from Google's

Multiple published industry benchmarks put Microsoft Advertising's typical cost-per-click for recruitment keywords somewhere in the range of 20–38% below Google's equivalent, reflecting lower auction competition on a smaller search network rather than any structural advantage in candidate quality. Lower cost per click doesn't automatically mean lower cost per qualified application — it means the trade-off is worth evaluating per role rather than assumed.

02A desktop-skewed, professional-leaning audience

Microsoft/Bing traffic skews noticeably more toward desktop than Google's more mobile-heavy mix — commonly cited estimates put Microsoft's desktop share in the 65–70% range. For roles where application completion on a desktop matters (longer forms, document uploads, technical assessments) or where the audience is more likely to be actively employed and searching from a work computer, that skew can be a genuine advantage rather than a footnote.

03LinkedIn profile targeting, structurally

Microsoft Advertising natively supports targeting parameters derived from LinkedIn profile data — company, industry, job function, and seniority — because Microsoft owns LinkedIn. This is a real, documented product capability of the platform, not an Expertini claim; the Microsoft Ads Integration exposes the relevant targeting options when building a campaign from a job, but the underlying targeting infrastructure belongs to Microsoft.

04The same cold-start math applies here too

Microsoft's Smart Bidding strategies parallel Google's in design and carry the same practical constraint: they need a reasonably steady conversion volume, commonly cited around 30–50 events per month per campaign, before automated bidding optimises reliably. Given Microsoft's smaller overall search volume, an individual job campaign is, if anything, less likely to clear that threshold than the equivalent Google campaign — worth factoring in before assuming the second channel will self-optimise quickly.

Frequently asked questions

Are Microsoft Ads CPCs really lower than Google's?⌄

Generally yes for recruitment keywords, by a range commonly cited around 20–38% depending on market — but lower cost per click isn't the same as lower cost per qualified application. It's worth testing for a specific role rather than assuming.

Who is Microsoft's audience actually good for?⌄

Roles where a desktop-heavy, professionally-skewed audience matters — Microsoft's traffic runs an estimated 65–70% desktop, and Microsoft Advertising's native LinkedIn profile targeting (company, industry, function, seniority) can be genuinely useful for senior or specialist roles.

Does this replace Google Ads or run alongside it?⌄

Alongside. Both connectors are managed from the same in-ATS workflow with independent budgets, so most teams run them as complementary channels rather than choosing one over the other.

Does Microsoft Smart Bidding have the same cold-start issue as Google's?⌄

Yes — it needs a comparable monthly conversion volume to optimise reliably, and Microsoft's smaller overall search volume makes clearing that threshold somewhat harder for a single job campaign, not easier.

At a glance

Same in-ATS workflow as the Google Ads Connector
Typically 20–38% lower CPC than Google for recruitment keywords
Desktop-skewed audience (~65–70%), useful for longer application forms
Native LinkedIn profile targeting — company, industry, function, seniority
Same Smart Bidding cold-start constraint as Google, on less volume
Your own Microsoft Advertising account, billed directly by Microsoft

See microsoft ads for job posts on your own hiring.

Bring a real job description to a 30-minute demo — free trial included.

Book a demo